Monthly Archives: September 2025

Flash Movie Review: The Conjuring: Last Rites

I HAVE A FRIEND WHO NEVER eats leftover food. It drives me crazy. He says the food rarely tastes as good on the second day, which is why he does not bother taking home any “doggie bags” from restaurants or friends and family meals. I, on the other hand, love leftovers. One of my favorite leftover food is pizza. In fact, I prefer eating it cold on the second day and even third when there is a lot of it leftover after a gathering. Another food I enjoy eating for a couple days after is turkey meatloaf or turkey sloppy joe’s. When I think about the type of foods I have eaten after the day they were made, there are very few I even bother heating up. From chicken chow mein, to lasagna, to chicken fajitas; I relish them just as much when they were first served hot from the stove. Maybe because many of my school lunch meals through elementary and high school were brown-bagged sandwiches, I still find it odd at times when someone I am with orders a hot meal for lunch. In my brain, it was trained that lunchtime would involve a cold sandwich and a bag of chips. The only food I can think of that I would eat warm at lunchtime was a hamburger or grilled cheese sandwich.      THIS IDEA OF EXTENDING A MEAL beyond a day can be easily translated to other genres; for example, books and movies. Most book sequels or installments from the original story have been just as moving to me. My first introduction to book series were the Hardy Boys’ books. I remember spending hours reading through these detective mystery books. When I was halfway through the series, I began alternating the Hardy Boys with other books because I wanted to extend my time reading about the boy detectives. It surprises me when I think about it since I was more of an “instant gratification” type of boy. Though, these days, I do find myself wishing I could binge watch some of the shows I watch on streaming platforms instead of doing them weekly or biweekly. With the movies I have seen, the opposite is true. There has been some film franchises that excelled with their sequels; however, in my experience, the majority of film sequels I watched were not as good as the original movie. The other thing about sequels, sometimes the first picture that came out was complete and satisfying to me. I did not need to see those same characters again. However, I have been surprised when it does happen and I find myself enjoying the different plots with each installment. Regarding today’s review of this latest sequel, it was not part of my awareness or desire that I wanted or needed to see these paranormal investigators again.      HAVING THE MINDSET THAT THEY WERE retired from their work with evil entities, a pair of investigators are drawn into one last case that could lead to serious consequences for their family. With Patrick Wilson (Midway, Moonfall) as Ed Warren, Vera Farmiga (Origin, The Many Saints of Newark) as Lorraine Warren, Mia Tomlinson (The Beast Must Die-TV, The Lost Pirate Kingdom-TV) as Judy Warren, Ben Hardy (Bohemian Rhapsody, Love at First Sight) as Tony Spera, and Rebecca Calder (Love Me Do, Kandahar) as Janet Smurl; this supernatural horror, mystery thriller surprised me. Granted, I walked into it with low expectations, but found it kept my attention as it built up a steady stream of suspense throughout the story. There was less violence and blood compared to the previous movies as the writers used a dual story line that alternated back and forth between the two. At first, I did not understand what was going on, wondering if I was seeing younger versions of Ed and Lorraine, or members of their extended family. But soon after, it became clear that the plots would intersect. The acting was good as well as the atmosphere of the sets and costumes. All in all, I was entertained and glad I saw what I hope will be the final installment.             

2 1/2 stars

Flash Movie Review: The Naked Gun

HUMOR IS SUCH A FLUID EMOTION; at least I think so. With the different styles of humor, not everyone finds the same things funny. For example, I do not much care for slapstick or physical types of humor. Where someone trips or falls down a flight of stairs, I do not find the humor in such things. However, I know a person who cannot stop laughing at such things. A friend of their’s slipped on the way down a staircase, and wound up bumping all the way down on their backside! My friend could not stop laughing; though, they at least were able to get these words out between the guffaws, “Are you ok?” Oddly, I used to love the cartoons of a road runner bird versus a coyote. If you are not familiar with them, the coyote would come up with different kind of traps to capture the bird, but they would always backfire. The reason I loved this cartoon was not for these scenarios but the inventions and ingenuity the coyote used in setting the traps. And as you know, in cartoon world, the character never dies; so no matter how many explosions, falls, and fire bombs the coyote experienced, they always survived.      MY TYPE OF HUMOR IS MORE esoteric. One may need to think about it or imagine it as it is being told to you. I also enjoy stories where certain words or phrases can have two meanings a/k/a double entendres. One liner jokes is another form of humor that I am fond of, from the likes of Rodney Dangerfield to Joan Rivers to Don Rickles, for example. As I grew older, I discovered the art of story telling humor, and especially satire. i had a relative who had such a dry sense of humor that I always loved. It takes real skill to spin a story and make it both relatable, funny, and at times absurd. Now, though I do not have a problem with profanity being used by some comedians, I strongly dislike when “dirty” and derogatory words are peppered throughout one’s act. Referring to females with the “B” word is not funny to me. If I am at a comedy club or attending a comedian’s concert, I used to feel awkward when everyone around me was laughing while I just sat still with no emotion coming out of me. When I became an adult, I learned how to fake a laugh and put an amused look on my face. Gratefully, I don’t do that anymore because I am not intimidated by being the only person not reacting to a comedian’s joke. Not that it was an issue for me while watching this action, crime comedy reboot.      FOLLOWING IN HIS FATHER’S FOOTSTEPS, A detective uses his special skills to try and save the world. With Liam Neeson (Marlowe, In the Land of Saints and Sinners) as Frank Drebin Jr., Pamela Anderson (The Last Showgirl, City Hunter) as Beth Davenport, Paul Walter Hauser (The Luckiest Man in America, Queenpins) as Ed Hocken Jr., Danny Huston (The Crow, The Dead Don’t Hurt) as Richard Cane, and CCH Pounder (RoboCop 3, NCIS: New Orleans-TV) as Chief Davis; this slapstick satire worked because of Liam Neeson and Pamela Anderson. Having Liam in this role was genius because of his tough serious guy persona, and the chemistry between him and Pamela made it easy for each to play off of the other. I liked the way the story brought in elements of the original franchise, and the jokes and gags were non-stop. Not necessarily my type of humor for the most part; however, there were a few times where I chuckled during a scene. All in all, this picture was a short and tidy piece that accomplished what it set out to do. Nothing new or astonishing, just a bit of nostalgia that hoped it would get a laugh out of the viewer.

2 2/3 stars